Switzerland debates whether to reduce the use of electric cars in an electrical emergency, but it is unlikely

Attention has drawn attention to a recent draft proposal in Switzerland on how to deal with emergencies due to forced power cuts. In the proposal, if an emergency reaches the 3rd stage, many uses of What has attracted the most attention is a rule that reduces non-essential driving in electric cars are discouraged or prohibited.

This has drawn attention due to the debate on how to prepare the world to manage the transition from gasoline to electric cars. In Europe, Russia’s war with Ukraine has disrupted energy supplies, raising fears of shortages and blackouts imaginable in a formula that is unprepared for the consequences of war.

Reading this, other people wonder if this may just be an explanation for why to buy an EV. While the rule allows driving to work, shopping, medical care and other essentials, and the correct Swiss rail formula would still work, other people are worried about what may be reduced.

Fortunately, the truth is not so scary. It’s just a project, not a regulation yet, and it’s unlikely to happen. If so, it will be a time when other people will be asked to do a lot, including lowering the temperature. Moreover, wars that cut off oil and combustible materials are just as likely, if not more so, to cause fuel shortages with discounts on driving those vehicles.

At the proposed level 3, many things in Swiss life are reduced, including:

In other words, this is an era of primary relief for Swiss Life. It doesn’t seem like a big demand, if you tell other people to turn down the thermostat, reduce the hours and turn off the appliances, if you ask other people not to go for recreational rides in their cars.

Other than things like this war, Switzerland is unlikely to want this plan. It gets 62% of its electrical energy from hydropower and 29% from nuclear power (although it is trying, wrongly, to eliminate its nuclear power plants). Grid of force. Its mountains and rainfall make it an ideal place for wind and hydroelectric power.

In fact, it is questionable that a shortage of oil and fuel is more likely to slow down the conduction of fuel than electricity, it is not excluded that it could simply happen the other way around, if they upgrade their nuclear with fossil, which turns out to be like a strange plan.

As such, this document, which is only a draft, would arguably be more an expression of Swiss prudence than a more likely situation for the future. On the contrary, it is a sign of the importance for Europe of preventing oil and gas, the acquisition of which has been the main catalyst for Russian autocracy and atrocities in Ukraine.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *