Release date: Tuesday, August 4, 2020 2:25 a.m.
Send your about the genuine season manager to [email protected]
As for the tedious debate about Solskjaer as opposed to Arteta, how can we know? Arteta didn’t spend any money? He had a window of motion and decided not to locate anyone? And still eighth? Another vision of Arteta’s season (FA Cup and eighth place) is that he is a deficient Van Gaal. Anyway, there are clubs that will fire him for it: the serious point is that it can always be Pep’s time, or it can be the new Marco Silva, and anyone who says he will surely pretend. One-man equipment? This less team from Aubameyang’s arsenal would sink like a stone.
We all do that with our own teams. Solskjaer’s problems in general aren’t great, but anyone with half the brain can see how well he’s moved the team this year. But you can locate the knowledge with which to defeat Solskjaer. But Johnny takes a whole new point when he talks about the five-year expense marker to criticize Solskjaer. I have a counteroffer: let’s rate Klopp through Liverpool’s functionality during the Premier League era. No? Only the last 15 years? Not even that? Just the last three before he might unsapses?
For the idiots who published it, how do they get it? Put the bottle of Scotch.
Abu365’s love for Arteta is strange, however, this site has been favorable to Arsenal, so his boy who finished in tenth place and then reached the end of the eighth was going to have more love than Ole. No matter if we’ve beaten City three times, we’ve beaten Chelsea at home and away, we’ve been undefeated for 19 games, they’ll point the finger at a moving cat as if he suddenly canceled all the achievements and not another club had spent a penny.
Now, if you’re predisposed through the FA Cup, it’s understandable (or it would be if it wasn’t the disastrous end of the league) but … for my life … I don’t see how Lampard qualifies at the time He took a team largely in a bad season and made them worse. He hasn’t learned anything since Derthrough.
For those obsessed with spending, United had to spend. In addition to the stupid way Ed Woodward runs the club, we have the “united tax” implemented in every transfer. Clubs see us coming, they know we have cash and we know we want a safe player quality. There’s no point in pretending otherwise. Other clubs will mourn poverty or justify not loving the player: years of poor urine control means United will never have that option.
We’re finally buying the right players, even if at inflated prices, and Ole deserves credit for that. And for moving on the less desirable ones. The Moyes, Van Gaal and Mourinho reigns were never going to be fixed in a season and, if you’re honest with yourself, Solskjaer is much further down the line of resolving those clusterfucks than anyone could possibly have thought.
However, I think Dave raises an attractive point. Compared to the costs paid by those players over a hundred million pounds, I think Sancho’s agreement for 108 million pounds (it’s 120 million euros, not sterling) has a pretty decent price, especially if a giant component is in multiple odds and/or founded on achievements. add-ons Here’s my reasoning:
He’s only 20 so this signing (were it to happen) would easily be seen as a long-term investment. Providing that he maintains a similar level of performance, we could potentially be looking at that right-wing position being sorted for the next ten years, by which time £108m would seem very reasonable. Of course if he flops then it will be seen as an expensive mistake but that’s true of any transfer – £64m for Di Maria looks horrendous now based on his time at United.
It is British, so there is an obvious inflation of its price because of that. But it also works in your favor; He already knows many players who can be his teammates at United England. And, given who he would be friends with in the English setup, he’s a character similar to many of those potential teammates, which can make the setup process easier.
You already have the correct contribution figures for your goals. The German league, for my money, is the closest popular (in taste and quality) to the Premier League, so the 33 goals and 37 assists in 97 appearances seem encouraging. If they gave us something like the numbers on United, it would be wonderful.
Check out those other moving fees: Griezmann, Dembele, Coutinho, Neymar, Mbappe, FelixArray… if you look at Sancho’s rates and think it’s a worse offer than any of those, I’m afraid you’re looking for this. with … what is the opposite of pink glasses? A poop-tinged monocle? Felix’s deal is the closest resemblance and I don’t think anyone at Atletico tells him that he’s not satisfied to pay for this for one of the highest-rated teenagers in Europe, and Sancho is definitely in the same category. Even compared to 85 million pounds for Maguire, 108 million pounds for Sancho (7 years younger) turns out to be a bigger investment.
I hope we can get over it and soon, but if it comes out, I’ll be delighted. Is that a lot of money to spend? Yes, absolutely. Is it a bet? Of course, all the moves are. But do we want it and it’ll make us better? Absolutely and almost certainly. Beyond having an effect on the team, this move would really be a smart indicator that things are becoming to improve on United; If Woodward can achieve the main goal in the first two weeks of the window, then he will be remarkable and very welcome, compared to the disaster Harry Maguire had last year.
Dave’s the mailbox this morning checked the passod fortunes of the firms of more than a hundred million pounds. He left one, Mbappe, other resources will give him other values of the move, however, it was more than a hundred million pounds. Mbappe has scored 69 passers in 75 appearances and won the World Cup. Given his age, he is probably the most prestigious player in the world at the moment and will in fact be enrolled on any team in the world. Besides, can we go beyond the concept that Lampard “didn’t spend anything.” He spent 40 million pounds to bring Kovacic on a permanent basis. I still don’t know how that was allowed under a movement ban. And even though he wasn’t a manager at the time of the firm, he was the first manager to use 60 million pounds Pulisic. Frank has had a permanent addition of a hundred million pounds to his team this summer. Definitely less than Ole, but in fact it’s nothing.
Jesus, I hate this statement.
“3. Football is out of control, how to hit a ball is $225 million?”
Maybe, just maybe, because football generates an incredible amount of interest across the globe. Everyone wants a piece, as a piece has a price. Where did you think the money goes?
Guendouzi would possibly be talented, but Stead doesn’t spend enough in his explanation of why to sell … Guendouzi literally can’t run a football. He’s almost afraid of him. In the first division, he’s a criminal. I would never have it on my team for that explanation why only … Unless he’s as smart as Xhavi (he’s not)
Kolasinac: also in the sales category, surpassing the diversity of 50 to 60%. Again, look for a team that faints from behind. It also “defends” by constantly pressuring an opponent …
I wrote a scathing email last year about Xhaka. I stick to the s, however, Arteta trained him perfectly. It no longer tries to spin, which is because its turning radius is that of an oil tanker. Play as he manages.
He no longer looks at the ball, is much more illuminated and the equipment is more compact, cancels the ease with which he can haggle. Fair play with him. Save it for the season, we have bigger problems.
Finally, I don’t like the direction of the club in terms of transfers. As Arseblog pointed out, our new technique based on “contacts” has led Luiz, and now probably Willian. Why willian? Good player but we have: Pepe and Auba left and right. With Nelson, Saka and Martinelli as backup. Oh, and he’s 31 years old with a big salary/fee registration.
Yves Bissouma – Very excited at the end and after hunting very promising but incoherent over the last year turns out to find his brand. He finished the season with a strike and has the chance to make a more objective contribution next season.
Neal Maupay: as Arsenal players will tell you, he has an advantage. 10 goals in a new team in its first season PL is a very clever start, however, their paint speed and their link game have also been very this season.
Steven Alzate: Missed the reboot due to injury, came from some unreturn loan spells to look like one of Brighton’s players in a variety of positions, with impressive composure. Potter has moved it a lot, but is expected to build the center of the field around Alzate and Bissouma next season.
Leandro Trossard – After talking about Brighton having his own Eden Hazard last August, injuries led to a series of games where he looked wonderful on the bench and a little disappointed at the start. More consistent after the reboot and ends the season with five goals and 3 assists.
Jurgen Locadia- Signing dodgy strikers signed from the Dutch league is a premier league rite of passage. Seems to have spent so long bulking up he can’t move his legs. His loan spell to FC Cinciniatti has not gone great.
Alireza Jahanbakhsh – The contender for the purpose of the season with a miraculous purpose opposed to Chelsea, but Graham Potter seems convinced through him and the extremes in general. With Trossard, the arrival of Adam Lallana and Alexis MacAllister is promising, it is unlikely to play consistent matches. He seems like a lovely boy, though.
Martin Montoya – signed from Valencia, played 45 games for Barcelona and despite playing over 50 games for the Albion has never really found a place in the fan’s hearts. He did have to contend with taking over from club legend Bruno. With Lamptey showing such promise and the arrival of Joel Veltman from Ajax it seems unlikely he will want to stay to be 3rd choice.
*This was a midtable clash, so we expected it to be fairly even. Both teams lined up in 4-4-2, and were very narrow in defence. Wonder if Tony Pulis was watching. In typical fashion, the only non-Japanese players were from Brazil. Zweigen’s striker Lucão, though resembling a classic target man, caused a lot of problems with his dribbling instead of simply being relied upon for headers. He had the first half chance, slightly against the run of play, when he burst through the defence but put a shot wide when one on one with the goalkeeper – a left-footed player would have been more likely to hook the shot on target, whereas his right-footed shot was straight and a couple of yards wide.
*The hosts took the lead midway through the first half. An attempt by Zweigen to switch the ball to the left wing cannoned off Ryoga Ishio straight to Masato Nakayama, who played a through ball into the path of Kazuma Yamaguchi; he rounded the keeper and slotted home.
*A defensive error was a big factor in Kanazawa’s equaliser as the first half was drawing to a close. A long ball forward from goalkeeper Yuto Shirai was flicked on by Lucão, and then completely misjudged by Mito centre-back Boniface Nduka, who let it bounce and then missed his kick when he tried to hook it clear. Young Kanazawa forward Mutsuki Kato was waiting on the edge of the area, and he rifled past the stranded Kenya Matsui in the Mito goal.
*Zweigen’s second goal, in the 57th minute, had a similar pattern to the first: a free kick sent long by Shirai and a mistake by Nduka, who turned too late and the ball bounced off his shoulder. Chasing up on the edge of the box, Lucão struck a rocket into the bottom corner past an unprepared Matsui.
*Shortly after this, a double substitution for the hosts made a difference as fatigue set in for Zweigen, playing for the third time in a week. As Mito started to enjoy a spell of possession, Nakayama was again involved, picking up the ball midway through the Kanazawa half. He played a one-two with one of the subs, Kai Matsuzaki, and received the ball back inside the penalty area. With his back to goal, he made just a few inches of space before spinning and arrowing a pinpoint shot between two defenders and past Shirai. This took the wind out of the Zweigen sails, but it was still an open game. In stoppage time, another one-two involving Matsuzaki allowed his fellow substitute, Brazilian forward Pitbull, to surge clear of a tired defence and score with a curling chip round and over Shirai.
– given that the change of the keeper was the only tangible thing done after the 0:9 drubbing and the impact he had in my opinion, I believe he was the biggest reason for the turnaround. Not taking credit from Ralph Hassenhuttl but had McCarthy not been available when the manager needed a change and had Angus Gunn continued, I don’t believe the turnaround would happen and Souhtampton could have been relegated.
– seeing what a solid goalkeeper could do for a team, not just in terms of actual saves but more in terms of the confidence of other players, is it maybe too harsh to blame Frank Lampard for the defensive shambles at Chelsea? Obviously Kepa has the worst statistics ever, he is the exact opposite of a keeper exuding confidence to his defence, Lampard wasn’t the one who brought Kepa to Chelsea and he could not really do that much about the goalkeeping situation this season. Is it possible that there will be a significant improvement in the defence next season without any personnel change bar the keeper?
– I find it strange that McCarthy is not discussed at all in the debate “Who deserves to be England number one?” Without saying that it is head and deserves to be surpassed above the others, however, it has had the greatest effect on the team this season, is only slightly behind Pope and Henderson in the WhoScored rankings (if that shows anything) and really has much more. passing statistics that both.
2) Aaron Ramsey in Man Utd makes no sense. The role that can play in the existing configuration is that played by Bruno Fernandes. To be a substitute, he would have to move to a quarter of his current salary at Juventus, to make monetary sense. Its main assets are in and around the opposition zone; in the deeper facilitator role, which can be abandoned through the potential sale of Pogba, is at the maximum average.
Well, you can believe my surprise horror when I open it to see that Leeds represents only 3 of the 10 positions and that we don’t even have the 1 or 2 most sensible.
How dare you 365? We were the league team last season.
Me with Liverpool and the Saints and proposed the next XI, which probably doesn’t have the pound-for-pound quality of Aodan’s CheArs team, but includes at least 11 players, with the option of Rickie Lambert if/when Danny Ings inevitably gets injured.
Bruce Grobbelaar
I just resisted the temptation to put Steven Caulker at the head, but I know it’s a delicate point with the Anfield faithful.
Then I came here with the concept of an Aston VillaPool XI and I think I could have won the jackpot. I’m sure the 3-4-3 lineup works, however, take a look at this offensive firepower with so many features from the bench (certainly defensively light). Impressive that any of the groups have shared wonderful PL goalkeepers in the last 30 years. And Scott Carson.
José Reina
Submarines: Scott Carson, Christian Benteke, Milan Baros, Peter Crouch, Patrick Berger, Brad Friedel, David James, Emile Heskey
God. I deserve to have made some paintings this afternoon, however, it is frankly more addictive than returning VAT from my company.
ManChelsea City: It looks wonderful on paper until George Weah was on the hill when he arrived in England.
Willy Caballero
The top two for Liverpool. Didn’t many Premier League club players buy?
Liver spurs
Brad Friedel
And, I dunno, West Hanfield. It’s not so good, that one.
David James
Update your browser to view this website. Update my browser now
×