You know you are now?
Chances are we’ll do it.
I’m not saying that you may know that in a specific situation or that you sit in your favorite chair at home, but I mean the look that knows spatially where you are.
Thanks to your senses and wit, you may realize that you are ten meters from a nearby TV and five feet from the nearest window. When you internal a room, your brain has a summary trend that helps track where it is and where other nearby items reside.
In addition to this awareness, your brain also that the room is under construction, that construction is in a building community and that the community is in a city, which is in a county, a state and a country. Etc.
Imagine employing something like an intellectual edition of Google Earth and your brain can zoom in and out, temporarily believe its location from a distant location, and at the same time be able to approach and know precisely where your feet are placed and its immediate, convenient environment.
This cognitive ability is called intellectual guidance.
Humans seem to have a great skill for intellectual guidance.
To make things clear, guidance is not just a service as discovered in humans and is an inherent installation in many living organisms.
However, it seems that we are taking this direction to a higher point of reflection.
Here’s what that means.
The perception of spatial orientation and spatial elements permeates much of what we do, beyond the undeniable act of locomotion.
Of course, he uses his intellectual guidance when looking to locate the kitchen or when he is in the forest and needs to return to his camp, however, that is only one component of the use of orientation.
Spatial orientation and processing are subtly reflected in the description of much of what we do.
You can simply describe a lifelong friend as a close and expensive friend and refer to your remote aunt. Note that the words “near” and “remote” refer to spatial problems and usually refer to someone’s physical proximity or something. In this use of choice, those words refer more to the relationships you have with those people.
In short, we borrow many spatial meanings to use them in other meaningful ways.
Why would you do that?
One theory is that our brain is so immersed in spatial functions that it needs to check the use of this built-in skill in one way as possible. Presumably we could also take advantage of a practical feature that is already rooted in our brains and used it for our survival merit. Spatial processing is similar to duct tape, which means it has many uses and we continue to look for new tactics to take advantage of it. We can’t help others.
Let us then separate the use of spatial processing from which our ordinary physical navigation facilitates and how spatial aspects are used for more summarized and unannounced purposes.
By the way, classical speculation is that spatial processing is primarily for locomotion and movement in our physical world, a probable point, some seek to argue that spatial processes perhaps were actually destined for our top-level thinking and that’s what happened. . be sanded to be used for frame navigation. A desirable proposal, it is difficult to make an argument as strong as the other way around.
Well, at least we know that guidance exists and it’s useful.
Keep in mind that your brain is full of wisdom and that those gold nuggets are organized like a library or bookstore. When you move to a physical library or bookstore, you may know that the cookbooks are in aisle 17 and that the auto-repair books are stacked to the back of the store.
Similarly, we locate ourselves hunting to think of a subject or subject and put our eyes blank, as if we were hunting inside our minds, hunting to locate the location of a fact difficult to understand about a wonderful ancient explorer or perhaps hunting for don’Olvídese of an algebraic. equation we learned in elementary school.
It turns out that we use guidance on the way we buy data in our minds.
The same spatial reminiscence that is where you left off your toothbrush can also explain the remarkable fact that Einstein developed the theory of relativity.
A toothbrush is a physical object in the genuine world and has some position, while Einstein’s reminiscence extract is a piece of wisdom that is conveniently arranged and stored in your head, however, or have in common the use of your cognitive. area powers.
It is convincing that intellectual guidance is a fundamental pillar for human beings to think.
Perhaps the facet in which we seem to be able to make a broader thought beyond that of other animals is that we have taken spatial processing to a higher level. This does not recommend that orientation is the only basis for the incredible extensions of human thought, and only emphasizes that it is an important explanation of why the astonishing facet of human intelligence.
Why all this trouble?
For those who are embarking on the progression of AI, the underlying energy of intellectual guidance must gain the respect and attention that is required.
It can simply be said that the guidance has earned that right.
You don’t see it that way.
It’s time to save and provide context.
Artificial intelligence is intended to attain the synthetic intelligence that is the idea of human intelligence.
The much-vasacked quest is to perceive how human intelligence works, to verify to give us an idea of what synthetic intelligence is the most likely to wish as well.
Some within AI tend to say that we don’t necessarily want to deconstruct or bone human intelligence, and that instead we can build whatever we want, as long as it turns out to provide the same appearance of intelligent behavior.
In fact, it’s a way to address the challenge and reduces the difficulty of having to get to the bottom of the internal secrets of the functioning of the human brain. Don’t worry about the human brain and do anything that turns out to have the same result.
Others who treat the human brain as a kind of impenetrable black box is a false trail and is ultimately doomed to failure. Instead of looking to conceive of the equivalent of a brain from scratch, the hope is that by finding the wonders of the brain, chances are we’ll get to AI.
If you believe that brain opening is the right path for AI, we already seem to know that intellectual guidance is essential for human intelligence and therefore logically we design and apply such guidance in AI systems.
For those on the other track, orientation offers attractive considerations, but it’s not as vital as a component to play.
Some AI programs simplify the orientation to make it an ingredient and practice.
Consider this intriguing question: Genuine self-driving cars based on artificial intelligence include a kind of intellectual guidance, not only for physical navigation, but also as a style based on general wisdom for operation and driving.
Let’s see what’s going on and let’s see.
Understanding self-driving cars
To be clear, genuine self-driving cars are the ones that AI drives all alone and there is no human assistance for the driving task.
These cars without driving force are considered grades four and five (see my explanation in this link here), while a car that requires a human driving force for a percentage of the driving effort is considered a point 2 or 3. Percentage of Driving Tasks are described as semi-autonomous and typically involve a variety of automated add-ons called Advanced Driver Assistance Systems (ADAS).
There is still a genuine self-driving car at point 5, which we even know if this will be possible or how long it will take to get there.
Meanwhile, Level Four efforts gradually seek to gain some traction by conducting very narrow and selective tests on public roads, there is controversy as to whether such evidence deserves to be allowed according to themselves (we are all guinea pigs of life or death in exconsistente, taking a stand on our roads and roads, some point out , see my indication in this link here).
Since semi-autonomous cars require a human driver, the adoption of such cars will not be very different from driving traditional vehicles, so there is not much new in itself on this subject (however, as you will see in a moment). , the following issues apply).
For semi-autonomous cars, it is vital that the public be aware of a disturbing facet that has happened in recent times, namely that despite those human driving forces that continue to publish videos of themselves falling asleep at the wheel of a point. 2 or 3 cars. Array will have to prevent us from deviating ourselves thinking that the driving force can divert its attention from the task of driving while driving a semi-autonomous car.
You are to blame for driving the vehicle, regardless of the automation point that may be thrown at point 2 or 3.
Autonomous and intellectual guidance
For the true autonomous vehicles of point four and five, there will be no human driving force involved in the task of driving.
All occupants will be passengers.
The AI is driving.
First, let’s face the obvious facets of physically oriented navigation orientation.
Using GPS and other navigation aids, adding the IMU (Inertial Measurement Unit, see my explanation in this link here), the AI driving formula will need to be aware of where the vehicle is and where it is headed.
Also, similar to how robots navigate, the AI driving system makes use of SLAM (Simultaneous Localization and Mapping, which I describe at this link here), a computational technique that enables the AI to do physical wayfinding.
Once autonomous AI cars become more widespread, humans will most likely no longer want to worry about orientation when traveling by car, as AI will take care of this task for them.
I don’t want to check a map before a vacation or your travels. Just sit in the seat, perhaps reclining, as self-driving cars are expected to have seats that turn into beds, allowing you to take a nap for a long trip and enjoy the holidays.
In the U.S. alone, we drive about 70 billion hours a year and have to keep our brains on our toes for the task of driving and navigation considerations as well. Of course, in fashion times, you can stick to the step-by-step commands of GPS and you don’t want to have an intellectually big picture in your brain of where you’re headed, yet you still exercise some intellectual guidance.
Some worry that once we rely on self-driving cars, our navigation-like intellectual guidance will decrease.
This is potentially a skill that, if updated, will atrophy.
You might think it doesn’t matter if we weaken our fitness skills, as we’ll have those self-driving cars to make our offers.
Friction is leakage due to such weakening.
Try not to forget the call of this well-known ancient explorer or the fact that Einstein will become increasingly complicated for us humans. The confidence is that guidance as a general capacity will minimize and, therefore, all other intellectual uses of guidance.
What do you think?
Will autonomous AI cars inadvertently lead to the human brain to a less lively state and maybe we’re stupid and stupider?
It’s a double, that is, we lose the ability to orient ourselves in the physical world, the more we undermine our intellectual prowess in orientation.
Here’s one to thicken the plot and make things worse.
Some other people think we will decide not to walk so much due to the advent of self-driving cars. Instead of going down the block to make a stop at a neighbor, we’ll get on the handy self-driving car and ask the AI to take us there (to be more informed about this social phenomenon, see my discussion on the link here).
If you settle for this theory, humans will exercise less and potentially swell.
The whole of this wonderful convergence affects fattened and neglected humans, wasting their intellectual merit and intellectual zombies, all for the convenience and glorious incorporation of autonomous cars into our world.
Wow, it turns out there’s a lot of luggage piled up in those self-driving cars.
Anyway, we’re going at speeds.
Can AI use intellectual guidance than navigation?
Yes, absolutely.
One such approach is the use of wisdom graphics, a strategy related to artificial intelligence that structures wisdom into a representation that can be interpreted simply as a tree that branches and extends in a multitude of directions.
Think about how this can be used in an AI-based self-driving car.
Suppose the AI drives autonomously and approaches the tracks.
You may not pay much attention to train tracks when driving a car. The unexpected facet of the railroads is that nearly 500 deaths a year occur in the United States due to the inability to face a crossing safely. There are about 128,000 public crossings and about 180,000 miles of railroad tracks in the United States (to be more informed about the risks to self-driving cars and junctions, see my research on this link here).
AI can treat each crossing as a type of individualistic driving situation and in the invisible past. Or, AI may have a treasure trove of facets in the past recorded when driving on train tracks, stored at its base of wisdom when driving.
By using an intellectual guidance component in AI, based on a knowledge graph, you access these other techniques and even past reports of having crossed railways.
They are then merged and used as a cross that the AI had never found before.
Artificial intelligence-based intellectual guidance can be used in a wide variety of other contexts, adding procedural discussions with the passenger of an autonomous car.
While today’s autonomous cars have limited capacity for herbal language processing (NLP), in the long run the LNP is expected to interact in broad dialogues with driving forces and perhaps even offer some kind of healing counselor such as its driving force and emotional adviser (for my explanation on thisArray , see the link here).
Conclusion
Have you ever let yourself be wandered?
Are there times when your mind seems to ramble, walk, walk, or in a different way to include some kind of metaphorical spatial work?
AI might want the same spatial set of shadows and capabilities, without which we couldn’t end up with an ambitious AI and be loaded with a smaller type of AI and not spatially oriented.
I vote for us to remain AI on the invigorating path to gratify the wonders of intellectual guidance and spatial wonders.
As Einstein was known to say, look at the deep inner nature and perceive everything better.
Dr. Lance B. Eliot is a world-renowned synthetic intelligence (AI) expert with over 3 million perspectives accumulated in his AI columns. As an experienced high-tech executive
Dr. Lance B. Eliot is a world-renowned synthetic intelligence (AI) expert with over 3 million perspectives accumulated in his AI columns. As an experienced executive and high-tech entrepreneur, it combines industry hands-on experience with in-depth educational studies to provide cutting-edge data on the long-term supply and long-term supply of AI and ML technologies and applications. Former PROFESSOR of USC and UCLA, and director of a pioneering artificial intelligence lab, speaks at primary events of the artificial intelligence industry. Author of more than 40 books, 500 articles and two hundred podcasts, he has appeared in media such as CNN and has co-hosted the popular radio show Technotrends. He has served as an advisor to Congress and other legislative bodies and has won many awards/recognitions. He is part of several director forums, has worked as a venture capitalist, angel investor and mentor of marketing founders and start-ups.