With the Democratic and Republican political conventions, the election season is in full swing. This month turns out to be a smart time to review the old trends of the past presidential election and how investors can use this wisdom to advise them throughout the current season.
The U.S. stock market hates uncertainty. That is why, as can be seen in the chart below, the market spot tended to be sold in September and October before the presidential election. Once the result of the election is known, regardless of the match he wins, the market place ends the year on a positive note, recovering in November and December.
Regardless of the existing polls, I think they will be close elections in November. And given the probably higher number of ballots by mail, it is very conceivable that we do not yet know the winner of the presidency the day after polling day. This uncertainty poses a threat to the stock market, and I think there is a high probability that this year will hold a precedent with new months of September and October minimum.
Market functionality on election season
Only two sectors recorded positive returns on average in October of an election year: retail and generation. Given the excessive execution of any of the sectors this year, it will be attractive to see if this trend continues. After the election, fitness care tends to work well. In November and December, the cyclical and commodity sectors recover optimistically for the new year, while the retail industry and generation are left behind.
When a incumbent wins a temporary mandate, regardless of the party, the market sometimes works better in the first year of the temporary term than in the first year of a new president, as shown in the chart below. This is possibly because of the fact that when the outgoing operator wins, it is because the US economy is strong. Given the economic weakness that exists as a result of the COVID-19 pandemic, I don’t know if we can expect that to happen if President Trump is re-elected.
The market also prefers a formula of brakes and counterweights, in which one party has executive power and the other at least one chamber of Congress. When the U.S. government It’s governed by a party, one-month, three-month performances have sometimes been negative, whether Republicans or Democrats are in charge. For six months, market functionality is stagnant under Democrats and strongly negative under Republican. However, a year after the election of the ruling party, the effects are positive on both parties.
The soft one at the end of the tunnel
History tells us that investors want to be cautious in the last days of summer and until September and October. After the election, the U.S. market performed well on average, regardless of the party it wins, the incumbents perform better in its first year than the new presidents. But since markets have canceled any appearance of general seasonal trends this year due to common cases of the pandemic, 2021 would possibly surprise us. In any case, I encourage investors to buckle up and reduce some of their threat as we introduce what is likely to be a bumpy election season.
Report:
No component of my remuneration has been, is or will be direct or similar to the express recommendations or revisions expressed herein. O’Neil Global Advisors, its affiliates and/or their respective officials, administrators or workers would possibly have interests or positions as buyers or sellers, and possibly at any time would make purchases or sales as principal or agent of the securities discussed herein.
I am chief investment officer at O’Neil Global Advisors (OGA), a subsidiary of O’Neil Capital Management, an investment that develops systematic equity transactions.
I am Chief Investment Officer at O’Neil Global Advisors (OGA), a subsidiary of O’Neil Capital Management, an investment advisor that develops systematic equitable trading methods that employ quantitative models and algorithms. Previously, I served as Chief Investment Strateeist at William O’Neil Co., an independent consulting firm that offers global buying and selling recommendations, independent studies, and personalized recommendations to many of the world’s leading institutional investment managers. I have controlled a lot of long and short coverage budgets, mutual budgets and institutional accounts and have overseen investment groups at Folger Hill Asset Management, Freedom Capital Management, Westfield Capital Management and The Boston Company. I am a qualified money analyst and appear on Reuters TV, Bloomberg Radio, CNBC and Fox Business.