Elon Musk is technically a “founder” of Tesla, according to judicial regulation. Merifies credits for Tesla’s successes, but it is true that it is not the main innovation of Tesla.
Although I am not an Elon Musk fan, I care more about the fact to insinuate it, which is not the case of many of his enemies. One of his lies they like to repeat is that he is not a “founder” of Tesla.
This is all they use to discredit their achievements: “He is a founder or an inventor. He has just bought concepts from others.
Although there is a safe truth, it is not the total truth. I had the impression that it would be clear things.
Tesla officially constituted on July 1, 2003 through Martin Eberhard and Marc Tarpenning to build an electric car manufacturer that is also a technological company, a concept that is still in the center of Tesla today.
In investment materials, Eberhard and Tesla de Tarpenning have indicated an objective to expand the fundamental technologies connected to “battery, PC software and the owner’s engine”. These are still Tesla de Tesla Technologies today.
But the maximum vital innovation of Tesla was the use and packaging of cylindrical cells of the lithium ion battery, in the past, basically used in electronic client products, such as laptops, in giant batteries for autay electric cars
He replaced the stage and is a concept that precedes Elon Musk’s participation with Tesla.
During their integration in 2003, Eberhard and Tarpenning have worked on the concept for some time. In the past they founded Nuvomedia, where the two founders built an early portable device, Rocketebook, an electronic electronic book reader in 1996.
They sold to the corporate in 2000, but before that, they worked in the next generation of their electronic book and in the batteries, they noticed impressive innovations in the capacity and load of the lithium ion battery.
The two engineers had serious considerations about the replacement of the climate and the import of oil. They made the calculation and concluded that the source of shipping with batteries that use renewable energies would have a significant effect on the relief of emissions and climate replacement.
Tesla did not invent electric cars. They were for a hundred years when creating the company, but they had to commit to fossil fuel vehicles, which prevented them from gaining popularity.
The Tesla difference: making cars with the new lithium -ion battery cells evolved for customer electronics, which caused electric cars without obligation.
This fundamental concept reflected in the guiding principles of Eberhard for Tesla:
1) An electric car deserves not being a commitment. With the correct technological options, it is imaginable to build electric cars that, in fact, are cars greater than their competitors.
2) Battery generation is the key to an electric car of success. Lithium ion batteries are only suitable for automotive use; They replace the situation, making the decent reality.
3) If it is well designed, electric cars can use a maximum serious car lovers, because the electricity unit must seriously overcome internal combustion engines.
This is the basis of Tesla’s success. The concept of taking the merit of progress with lithium -ion batteries in the 1990s to deliver electric cars without obligation.
It was the fundamental innovation of Tesla. It sounds simple, but it took work. The battery manufacturer was not sought to build lithium -ion cells for electric vehicles, so Tesla had to buy cells outside the doors themes destined for computer computers and to wrap thousands of those cylindrical cells in modules and battery packages They could be viable in a car. This is a concept that had never been done before.
And a concept is nothing without execution.
Musk says that his interest in electric cars has Tesla. There is no explanation of why not him, but there is no evidence that it has anything to do with the previous concept.
In fact, before his foray into the rise of the new Internet companies in Silicon Valley, Musk went to Stanford University to examine superc forns, which says he has done with the hope of using them in electric cars. This would recommend that the idea that supercaugaders would be the long execution of electric cars that lithium ion batteries.
Musk and Tesla accumulated a company called AC Propulsion.
CA propulsion The pioneer of the resurgence of electric cars and built the Tzero electric sports car in the 1990s.
First, he used lead batteries as his predecessors, however, the corporate changed it to lithium -ion batteries cells in the early 2000s. It is not transparent that had the concept of first or if it was a thought Parallel, however, we know that Ca and Eberhard’s propulsion was in contact with conversion.
Eberhard tried to convince CA propulsion to market the new Tzero, but the company refused because it went to some other product. This is where Eberhard and Tarpenning will launch Tesla.
How did Musk enter the scene?
Musk, who worked in Spacex at that time, contacted JB Straubel, a young electrical engineer with a long -standing interest in electric vehicles, specifically through the construction of his own Porsche EV in his garage.
Only outside the school, Straubel worked in the upper altitude aircraft at that time, anything that interests musk, for what they gathered. The conversion despite everything that turned in electric vehicles, and Straubel, which was deeply hooked in this small world, caused the conscious musk of CA’s propulsion.
They check torto with lithium -ion batteries and musk has been sold. Like Eberhard, he tried to convince CA propulsion to market the product. Tom Gage, CEO of Propulsion AC, refused again, but taking into account the same way, connected Eberhard to Musk, who had just presented Tesla with Tancening, with Ian Wright, who had joined the two engineers.
A few months later, in February 2004, Musk led Tesla to invest with $ 6. 5 million of $ 7. 5 million of his pockets.
Eberhard has become CEO, and JB Straubel, who, despite his young age, had the maximum delight in the structure of electric cars, joined as a technology leader.
Musk occupied with Spacex, but he more active in Tesla than to be just an investor and member of the Board of Directors.
While Tesla worked at the Roadster, Musk directed several other financing cycles, providing an investment giant itself.
Things were worse in 2007. Tesla had disorders that led the roadster to production in their budget. The movement to use the Lotus Elise Chassis turned out to be a mistake, and in the end, Tesla Roadster had shared 6% of its portions with Elise, because the maximum of them had to be reworked.
In the summer of 2007, the Board of Directors, directed by Musk, asked Eberhard to resign. Several interim CEO continued before Musk resumed in 2008.
Eberhard absolutely left the company, and in 2009, he continued to Tesla and Musk for expelling her. The two parties accused each of Tesla’s problems, and Eberhard said that Musk “rewritten the story” as if Tesla himself had founded.
In the end, an approval judgment on the rejected component of the Ebarhard trial, then the two components resolved and agreed that five other people can be called co -founders in Tesla: Eberhard, Tarpenning, Wright, Musk and Straubel.
Now, in a civil matter like this, the result is not necessarily the most fair. In general, those who have the maximum effective and the lawyers win.
So, I will not say that there is no price to wonder if Elon is a founder of Tesla. I perceive that there are nuances here, but all the parts in question have solved the question. My main point is that it doesn’t matter.
The main concept of Tesla to create an uncompromising electric vehicle through the merit of innovations in the mobile technology of lithium ion battery. However, all evidence indicates that Musk is not worried in this fundamental concept.
That said, we have to grant credits where it is due to credits. He identified him as an intelligent concept and put more effective to get there than everything that is in a position to do so at that time.
Therefore, it can argue that Tesla would have happened without a musk, what the founding argument does.
After that, you will also have to give credits to Musk for the good fortune of Tesla. It has been CEO since 2008 and the company has completed things under its direction. They controlled to make electric cars and led the industry to transfer to electric battery cars.
To date, it is the “Tesla Secret Plan” Musk’s original in 2006 that convinced me that Tesla would be the company to bring electric cars to the dominant current. The logical plan and he executed under his direction. He took the original idea, expanded it, financed it and then controlled the team that made it.
The last point is because this is where I begin to agree with musk opponents. AlmizCles enthusiasts like to say that it is a kind of genius genius. Jamie Dimon has just called “Our Einstein. ” Although I can admit that Elon is intelligent and has a higher understanding of the average of many principles of physics and engineering, comparing it with one of the maximum shocking theorists of all time is natural madness.
Although Musk has made technical contributions to Tesla, I think they are exaggerated through their basis of enthusiasts and that the Tesla team does not have enough credits. JB Straubel, director of the Long Data Generation of Tesla until 2019, and its groups deserve to download the vast majority of credits for technical contributions and progress in the generation of battery electronics and strength that has allowed Tesla to succeed.
There are too many to call them all, but I have been informing about Tesla for more than a decade. Thanks to my reports, resources have congratulated other people such as Straubel, Drew Baglino, Kurt Kelty, Colin Campbell, Peter Rawlinson, Charles Kuehmann, Alan Clarke, Dan Priestley, Lars Moravy, David Zhang, Evan Small and Franz Von Holzhausse for their Controls in the contraction in the controls in Teslaa.
In summary, it is to say that Elon Musk co, ”Tesla gave. Yes, he played an essential role in the survival and good fortune of the corporate, but I also think it is correct to say that it was not Tesla’s main innovation, and the most productive talents of the corporate do not discharge enough. Credits to deliver the mission.
At 60 years of acquiring and driving cars, I never have an idea of the CEO or members of the Board of Administrators or one of the main instructions. I only have an idea of the car and if it corresponded to what I needed. Tesla was the first American car of the 60 years I have bought, which deserves to give an indication of what I think. Personally, I don’t hate Elon because I have never met him. I can only judge your movements and according to this standard. I am very disappointed. I would have trouble saying that I would buy another Tesla at this stage, however, we should have all the other brands in the coming years to pass out with a car that is a worthy competitor.
The project to accelerate the global transition to sustainable power is lovely and this is what attracted a giant component of talents in Tesla.
Unfortunately, Musk’s leadership in years has moved away from Tesla from this mission, which is my great fear for the company.
Anyway, I sought to establish the registration directly in your contribution before absolutely destroying your own reputation and credibility.
Fred is editor -in -chief and major in Electk.
You can send on Twitter (DMS Open) or by email: Fred@9to5mac. com
Thanks to Zalkon. com, you can check the Fred portfolio and download investment concepts per month on green shares.