Ad
Supported by
The Corporation’s Board of Promised Investors would pay close attention to how corporate controlled workers.
By Jack Ewing
In Washington, Elon Musk has been at the forefront of the Trump administration’s efforts to motivate systems designed to advertise diversity.
At the same time, Tesla, the electric car company that Mr. Musk has been leading, in days, with little notice, tried to appease critics who have accused the company of racial discrimination.
In a low-interest segment of the company’s annual report released Jan. 29, its board promised to monitor “how Tesla recruits, develops, and keeps talent. “
For shareholders who have long pushed Tesla to respond to racism court cases at its factory in Fremont, California, generic wording is a rare case of turning the company’s habit in the face of criticism.
For the first time, the board assumes the duty on how employees of employees, some investors said. He has been accused in prosecutions of being too passive in his surveillance of Mr. Musk, who runs several other corporations and has been elected to President Trump to cut government spending.
“This is something that has been sought after for a long time,” said Kristin Hull, founder of NIA Impact Capital, an investment fund based in Oakland, California, which has filed shareholder resolutions calling on the board to take a more active role.
We are having to recover the content of the article.
Allow JavaScript in your browser settings.
Thank you for your patience as we determine access. If you’re in reader mode, log out and log in to your Times account or we subscribe to all times.
Thank you for your patience as we determine access.
Already a subscriber? Sign in.
Do you want all the time? Subscribe.
Advertisement